Minds Are Open Only When Hearts Are Opened Argumentative Essay Example For Students

Minds Are Open Only When Hearts Are Opened Argumentative Essay Gandhi, as he was popularly called, proved that non-violence is the most effective instrument of social change. His teachings are promoted even today to avoid violence and find peaceful solutions to conflicts. Through his sheer dedication and self-belief, Gandhi freed India from the British Raja (British Rule). He proved to the world that freedom can be achieved through the path of non. Violence. For Gandhi Non-violence and Truth were two inalienable virtues. He summed up the entire philosophy of his life as : The only virtue I want to claim is truth and non-violence. I lay no claim to super human powers want none. The United Nations General Assembly announced on 15th June, 2007 that October 2nd will be celebrated as the International Day of Non-Violence. Some of the famous quotes by Mahatma Gandhi have been listed below: * Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever. ;k Fear is not a disease of the body; fear kills the soul. ;k The principle of majority does not work when differences on fundamentals are involved. * Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes. It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence. * It is unwise to be too sure of ones own wisdom. It is healthy to be reminded that the strongest might weaken and the wisest might err. ;k You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty. * Honest differences are often a he althy sign Of progress. * Whatever you do may be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it. O, Apostle of Peace, O, Teachers of co-operation, l, your little child, Offer you my salutation. When we think of you, We remember Truth and Non-violence, And we cherish your memories, With almost reverence. You taught us with your Charka, That India will always progress, May you give us strength, And our efforts always bless, You gave our country freedom, And gave us faith and hope, The country of your dreams will work together, As if tied by a divine rope. You, Father of this Nation, Gave our country birth, And generation to come Will hardly believe, That people such as you walked the Earth Mohammad Grammarian Gandhi (pronounced grammarian @a. Dhal ( listen); 2 October 1869 30 January 1948), commonly known as Mahatma Gandhi or Papua (Father of Nation), was the preeminent leader of Indian nationalism in British-ruled India. Employing non-violent civil disobedience, Gandhi led India to independence and inspired movements for non-violence, civil rights and freedom across the world-121 Gandhi became famous by fighting for the civil rights of Muslim and Hindu Indians in South Afri ca, using new techniques of non-violent civil disobedience that he developed. Returning to India in 1915, he set about organizing peasants to protest excessive land-taxes. A lifelong opponent of communality (i. E. Basing politics on religion) he reached out widely to all religious groups. He became a leader of Muslims protesting the declining status of the Caliphate, Assuming leadership of the Indian National Congress in 1321, Gandhi led nationwide campaigns for easing poverty, expanding womens rights, building religious and ethnic amity, ending intractability, increasing economic self-reliance, and above all for achieving Swards-?the independence of India from British domination. Early life Mohammad Grammarian Gandhi was born on 2 October 1869 in Paperboard, a coastal town which was then part of the Bombay Presidency, British India. His father, Grammarian Gandhi (1822-1885), served as the dawn (chief minister) of Provender state, a small princely salute state in the Stairway Agency of British India. 1 His grandfather was Transcend Gandhi, also called Tutu Gandhi. In May 1883, the 13-year-old Mohammad was married to 14-year-old Austria Making (her first name was usually shortened to Stature, and affectionately to Bal) in an arranged child marriage, according to the custom of the region. ALL] In the process, he lost a year at school. Recalling the day of their marriage, he once said, As we didnt know much about marriage, for us it meant only wearing new clothes, eating sweets and playing with relatives. However, as was prevailing tradition, the adolescent bride was to spend much time at her parents house, and away from her husband. 2] In 1885, even Gandhi w as 15, the couples first child was born, but survived only a few days. Sandhogs father, Grammarian Gandhi, had also died earlier that year. The religious background was eclectic. Sandhogs father was Hindu Made Banana and his mother was from Prename Visional family. Religious figures were frequent visitors to the home. Mohammad and Stature had four more children, all sons: Harlan, born in 1888; Minimal, born in 1892; Ramada, born in 1897; and Devils, born in 1900. 1201 At his middle school in Paperboard and high school in Ratio, Gandhi remained mediocre student. He shone neither in the classroom nor on the playing field. One of the terminal reports rated him as good at English, fair in Arithmetic and weak in Geography; conduct very good, bad handwriting, He passed the matriculation exam at Smalls College in Vinegar, Gujarat, with some difficulty. Sandhogs family wanted him to be a barrister, as it would increase the prospects of succeeding to his fathers post. Gandhi] ( listen); 2 October 1869 -? 30 January 1948), commonly known as Mahatma Gandhi or Papua (Father of Nation), was the preeminent leader of Indian Gandhi led India to independence and inspired movements for non-violence, civil rights and freedom across the world Education The son of a senior government official, Gandhi was born and raised in a Banana community in coastal Gujarat, and trained in law in London. Gandhi became famous by fighting for the civil rights of Muslim and Hindu Indians in South Africa, using nevi techniques Of non-violent civil disobedience that he developed. Returning to India in 1915, he set about organizing peasants to protest excessive land-taxes. A lifelong opponent Of communality (i. E. Assign politics on religion) e reached out widely to all religious groups. He became a leader of Muslims protesting the declining Status Of the Caliphate. Assuming leadership Of the Indian National Congress in 1921, Gandhi led nationwide campaigns for easing poverty, expanding womens rights, building religious and ethnic amity, ending Swards-?the independence of India from British domination In 1888, Gandhi traveled to London, England, to study law at university College London, where he studied Indian law and jurisprudence and to train as a barrister at the Inner Temple. His time in London was influenced by a vow he had made to his mother pond leaving India, in the presence to again monk, to observe the precepts of abstinence from meat and alcohol as well as of promiscuity. 128] Gandhi tried to adopt English customs, including taking dancing lessons. However, he could not appreciate the bland vegetarian food offered by his landlady and was frequently hungry until he found one of Loons vegetarian restaurants. Influenced by Henry Salts writing, he joined the Vegetarian Society, was elected to its executive committee, and started a local Backwater chapter. 16] Some of the vegetarians he met oeuvre members of the Theosophical Society, which had en founded in 1875 to further universal brotherhood, and which was devoted to the study of Buddhist and Hindu literature. They encouraged Gandhi to join them in reading the Baghdad Gait both in translation as well as in the original. 129] Not having shown interest in religion before, he became interested in religi ous thought. Gandhi was called to the bar in June 1891 and then left London for India, where he learned that his mother had died While he was in London and that his family had kept the news from him. 291 His attempts at establishing a law practice in Bombay failed because he was too shy to speak up in court. He returned to Ratio to make a modest living drafting petitions for litigants, but he was forced to close it when he ran afoul off British In 1893, he accepted a year-long contract from Dada Abdullah ; Co an Indian firm, to a post in the Colony of Natal, South Africa, then part of the British Empire. IN THE DARK CONTINENT Civil rights movement in South Africa (1893-1914) Gandhi was 24 when he arrived in South Africa] to work as a legal representative for the Muslim Indian Traders based in the city of Pretoria. 31] He spent 21 years in South Africa, where he developed his political views, ethics and lattice leadership skills. Purported photograph of Gandhi in South Africa (1895) Indians in South Africa were led by wealthy Muslims, who employed Gandhi as a lawyer, and by impoverished Hindu indentured laborers with very limited rights. Gandhi considered them all to be Indians, taking a lifetime view that Indians transcended religion and caste. He believed he could bridge historic differences, especially regarding religion, and he took that belief back to India Where he tried to implement it. History of Swimming EssayGandhi took Goalies liberal approach based on British Waggish traditions and transformed it to make it look wholly Indian. Gandhi took leadership Of Congress in 1920 and began a steady escalation of demands (with intermittent compromises or pauses) until on 26 January 1930 the Indian National Congress declared the independence Of India. The British did not recognize that and more negotiations ensued. With Congress taking a role in provincial government in the late asses. Gandhi and Congress withdrew their support of the Raja when the Viceroy declared war on Germany in September 1939 without consulting anyone. Tensions escalated until Gandhi demanded immediate independence in 1942 and the British responded by imprisoning him and tens of thousands of Congress leaders for the duration. Meanwhile the Muslim League did cooperate with Britain and moved, against Sandhogs strong opposition, to demands for a totally separate Muslim state of Pakistan. In August 1947 the British partitioned the land, with India and Pakistan each achieving independence on terms Gandhi disapproved. Role in World War I See also: The role of India in World War In April 1918, during the latter part of World War I, the Viceroy invited Gandhi to a War Conference in Delhi. 51] Perhaps to show his support for the Empire and help his case for Indians Gandhi agreed to actively recruit Indians for the war effort. In contrast to the Zulu War of 1306 and the outbreak of World War in 1914, when he recruited volunteers for the Ambulance Corps, this time Gandhi attempted to recruit combatants. In a June 1918 leaflet entitled Appea l for Enlistment, Gandhi wrote To bring about such a state of things eve should have the ability to defend ourselves, that is, the ability to bear arms and to use them. life Vaunt to learn the use Of arms with the greatest possible dispatch, it is our duty to enlist ourselves in the He did, however, stipulate in a letter to the Viceroys private secretary that he personally will not kill or injure anybody, friend or Sandhogs war recruitment aiming brought into question his consistency on nonviolence as his friend Charlie Andrews confirms, Personally I have never been able to reconcile this with his own conduct in other respects, and it is one of the points where have found myself in painful disagreement, [561 Sandhogs private secretary also had acknowledged that The question of the consistency between his creed of Aims (non-violence) and his recruiting campaign was raised not only then but has been discussed ever Champaign and Qaeda Main article: Champaign and Qaeda Straight Gandhi i n 1918, at the time of the Qaeda and Champaign Satyriasis Sandhogs iris major achievements came in 1918 with the Champaign and Qaeda agitations of Briar and Gujarat, The Champaign agitation pitted the local peasantry against their largely British landlords who were backed by the local administration. The peasantry was forced to grow Indigo, a cash crop whose demand had been declining over two decades, and were forced to sell their crops to the planters at a fixed price. Unhappy with this, the peasantry appealed to Gandhi at his ashram in Metadata. Pursuing a strategy of non-violent protest, Gandhi took the administration by surprise and won concessions from the In 1918, Qaeda was hit by floods and famine and the peasantry was demanding relief from taxes. Gandhi moved his headquarters to organizing scores of supporters and fresh volunteers from the region, the most notable being Bilharzias Patella. Losing non. Cooperation as a technique, Gandhi initiated a signature campaign where peasants pledged non-payment of revenue even under the threat of confiscation of land. A social boycott of mallards and dilators (revenue officials within the district) accompanied the agitation. Gandhi worked hard to win public support for the agitation across the country. For five months, the administration refused but finally in end-May 1918, the Government gave way on important provisions and relaxed the conditions of payment of revenue tax until the famine ended. In Qaeda, Valhalla Patella represented the farmers in negotiations with the British, who suspended revenue collection and released all the Skillful movement In 1919 Gandhi, with his weak position in Congress, decided to broaden his base by increasing his appeal to Muslims, The opportunity came from the Skillful increment, a worldwide protest by Muslims against the collapsing status of the Caliph, the leader of their religion. The Ottoman Empire had lost the World War and was dismembered, as Muslims feared for the safety of the holy places and the prestige of their Although Gandhi did not originate the All- India Muslim which directed the movement in India, he soon became its most prominent spokesman and attracted a strong base of Muslim support with local chapters in all Muslim centers in India. His success made him Indians first national leader With a multicultural base and facilitated his rise to power within Congress, which had previously been unable to reach many Muslims. In 1920 Gandhi became a major leader in By the end f 1922 the Skillful movement had collapsed. Non-cooperation Main article: Non-cooperation movement Mahatma Gandhi spinning yarn, in the late asses With Congress now behind him in 1920, Gandhi had the base to employ non- operation, non-violence and peaceful resistance as his weapons in the struggle against the British Raja. His wide popularity among both Hindus and Muslims made his leadership possible; he even convinced the extreme faction of Muslims to support peaceful non-cooperation. The spark that ignited a national protest was overwhelming anger at the Clinically Bag massacre (or Amorists massacre) of hundreds of peaceful civilians by British troops in Punjab. Many Britons celebrated the action as needed to prevent another violent uprising similar to the Rebellion of 1857, an attitude that caused many Indian eaters to decide the Raja was controlled by their enemies. Gandhi criticized both the actions of the British Raja and the retaliatory violence of Indians. He authored the resolution offering condolences to British civilian victims and condemning the riots which, after initial opposition in the party, was accepted following Sandhogs emotional speech advocating his principle that all violence was evil and could not be justified. During this period, Gandhi claimed to be a highly orthodox Hindu and in January 1921 during a speech at a temple in Avatar, he spoke of the relevance of non-cooperation to Hindu Dharma, At this holy place, declare, if you want to protect your Hindu Dharma, non- cooperation is first as well as the last lesson you must learn Substrata Ashram, Sandhogs home in Gujarat In December 1921, Gandhi was invested with exec utive authority on behalf of the Indian National Congress. Under his leadership, the Congress was reorganized with a new constitution, with the goal of Swards_ Membership in the party was penned to anyone prepared to pay a token fee. A hierarchy of committees was set up to improve discipline, transforming the party from an elite organization to one of mass national appeal. Gandhi expanded his non-violence platform to include the Swedish policy-?the boycott of foreign-made goods, especially British goods. Linked to this was his advocacy that shady (homespun cloth) be worn by all Indians instead of British-made textiles.

Strategic Theory Essay Example

Strategic Theory Essay Given the sea-change in warfare which has seemingly taken place since the publication of Clausewitz On War in the first half of the nineteenth century, it is logical to wonder whether or not the principles detailed in   On War comprise a suitable framework for discussion of modern warfare. Interestingly enough, Clausewitz himself divided the elements of war into distinctive categories: objective and subjective with which he hoped to describe those elements or qualities that every war has in common (such as friction and chance), as objective while subjective was used to infer those qualities that vary from war to war, such as the types of armed forces employed and their weapons and tactics. This distinction demonstrate that Clausewitz intended for hsi theories to bridge the gaps in time between his articulation of them and a later reading or study of his principles.   (Echevarria and Gray 2005) That said, it remains quite topical to ask: what role do Clausewitzs exhaustive theories on war play in modern considerations of warfare and, also, do Clausewitzs theories regarding war provide any useful paradigms or wisdom regarding the projection of warfare into humanitys future, beyond even our own contemporary times? To complicate matters, though Clausewitz did distinguish between objective and subjective elements in warfare, nowhere did he that the objective nature of war does not or cannot change; on the contrary: Clausewitz seems to suggest that warfare is more than a simple chameleon that only partially changes its nature from case to case with the implication that while there may be some definite underlying principles of warfare which extend unchanged to some degree throughout history, these aspects may also change color and not prove as reliably predicted or abstracted as one would hope. (Echevarria and Gray 2005) We will write a custom essay sample on Strategic Theory specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Strategic Theory specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Strategic Theory specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Before probing the densities of Clausewitzs specific theories and principles of warfare as explicated in   On War for their   possible or probable relevance to present or future wars, it will prove useful to specifically determine just what aspects of modern warfare present the most challenging paradigm through which to view the theories presented in On War.   To begin, Kaldors the idea of old wars versus new wars is a relatively simple categorization:   with old standing   for a stereotyped version of war, drawn from the experience of the last two centuries in Europe, in which war consisted of a conflict between two symmetrical warring parties, generally states or proto-states with legitimate interests, and new wars standing for forms of war which adhere to asymmetrical models and produce more ambiguous forms of victory and defeat. Another distinction between old wars and new wars is that of potential destructiveness with the increase in the destructiveness and accuracy of all forms of military technology, as a consequence of the Clausewitzean logic of extremes, foisting an era which has made symmetrical war, war between similarly armed opponents, increasingly difficult. (Kaldor 2005, 210-211) While it seems obvious that modern asymmetrically based warfare has put a superficial strain on Clausewitzs overt definition of warfare as an act of force to compel our adversary to do our will; however, even when modern warfare is dissected for its potential variances from classical warfare, the net result may still be a potential fit for Clausewitzs aphoristic statement.     (Clausewitz 1950, 5) To some observers, modern warfare   can be defined in terms of identity politics, that is to say, the claim to control the state or bits of the state in the name of an exclusive group identified in terms of ethnicity, religion or tribe which yet comprises an attempt to compel an adversary by force to do our will although this type of exclusive politics, whether based on ethnicity, religion or clan, can be contrasted with universalistic ideologies like earlier liberal nationalism or socialism, which proposed a state-building project for the entire population and can, instead be regarded as expressions of will which originate outside of the nation-state. (Kaldor 2005, 212) However designated, acts of force in modern warfare adhere to Clausewitzs underlying and unifying principles of objective and subjective war.   At influence here also is the contrasts between strategic and tactical goals and practices. A superficial change in tactics, or even a radical shift in tactics, will not and should not be regarded as a change in the fundamental goals or elements of warfare. Since tactics teach the use of the armed forces in engagements, and strategy the use of engagements to attain the object of the war. (Clausewitz 1950, 62) The goal of war is to attain the strategic ends of the particular war: there is no single goal, no single purpose which can be said to encompass all wars; however victory and defeat can be defined as the measurement of whether or not a wars given strategic goals have been attained, regardless of the impetus, duration, or tactics involved in the overall prosecution of the war. In some instances, the goal of war will be the destruction of his [the enemys] military forces and the conquest of his provinces; in other wars, the strategic goal may be simply to cause the enemy to rethink his own position and strategy: If we attack the enemys forces, it is a very different thing whether we intend to follow up the first blow with a succession of others, until the whole force is destroyed, or whether we mean to content ourselves with one victory in order to shatter the enemys feeling of security, to give him a feeling of our superiority, and so to instil into him apprehensions about the future. (Clausewitz 1950, 21) These are two examples which span a good bit of the known strategic objectives of war or even the initiation of a single battle; they are not exhaustive examples and although they do represent divergent objectives, they also represent a simplification of historical evolution, along the lines of the old war new war paradigm and are meant simply to elucid ate the changeable nature of Clausewitzs over-reaching theories or at least the adaptability of these theories into a more modern setting. In modern wars, it may be more difficult to distinguish an offensive action from a defensive action. The American invasion of Iraq, for example, has applications as a defensive tactic in the larger strategic picture of the war on terror but the specific engagement on the ground in Iraq involves an exchange of offensive and defensive tactics depending on the specific engagement and circumstances of individual battles.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Seen from the side of Americas enemies, the war in Iraq finds a fitting expression by Clausewitz on dissipating what comprises the enemys strength: The enemys expenditure of strength lies in the wastage of his forces, consequently in the   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   destruction of them on our part, and in the loss of provinces, consequently the conquest of them by us. (Clausewitz 1950, 22) Strictly speaking, Clausewitz viewed defensive strategy as only a partial articulation of an overall war-strategy. His suggestion is that defense is really a tactical element: What is the conception of defense? The warding off of a blow. What then is its characteristic sign? The awaiting of this blow. This is the sign which makes any act a defensive one, and by this sign alone can defense be distinguished from attack in war however, Clausewitz is careful to point out that the use of defensive tactics alone completely contradicts the conception of war, because there would then be war carried on by one side only, it follows that defense in war can only be relative, and the above characteristic sign must therefore only be applied to the conception as a whole; it must not be extended to all parts of it. (Clausewitz 1950, 317) On the other hand, attacks in warfare provide the most direct extension of   Clausewitzs definition of warfare as   an act of force to compel our adversary to do our will and as such, the attack in Clausewitzs theories of war implies that the attacker either possesses the initiative in a given struggle or believes he does, or hopes to win initiative back through the use of an attack. Attacks, like defense, are a a prat of overall war strategy and seldom, if ever, comprise the pure totality of a given war strategy. In fact, as related above regarding the US invasion of Iraq single actions in a given campaign may be regarded as attacks in tactical connection, but defensive blows in relation to overall strategy. Both offense and defense must be regarded under Clausewitzs detailed analysis and definition of strategy: Strategy is the use of the engagement to attain the object of the war. It must therefore   Ã‚  Ã‚   give an aim to the whole military action, which aim must be in accordance with the   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   object of the war. In other words, strategy maps out the plan of the war, and to the   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   aforesaid aim it affixes the series of acts which are to lead to it; that is, it makes the plans   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   for the separate campaigns and arranges the engagements to be fought in each of them.                                   (Clausewitz 1950, 117) Implied in the above definition, which is also an implication of the goals of warfare, is the idea that prolonged struggle between opposing forces produces a series of engagements: some offensive, some defensive in nature and that the execution of tactical modes is a crucial aspect of whether or not success within the subjective ramifications of victory will be achieved by any side in a prolonged struggle. In this way, duration factors as one of the underlying elements of warfare in Clausewitzs theories. There can be no exact determination of the duration of any given war before its actual fighting: The duration of an engagement is necessarily bound up with its essential conditions. These conditions are: absolute amount of strength, relation in strength and arms between the two sides, and the nature of the country; however, extrapolation of probable duration from pre-engagement factors is only guesswork: a battle will dictate its own duration. (Clausewitz 1950, 187) That said, some expectations can be gleaned: A cavalry engagement is decided sooner than an infantry engagement; and an engagement entirely between infantry more quickly than if artillery is present; in mountains and forests we do not advance as quickly as on level ground. All this is clear enough if still shrouded in possible unknown contingencies.   However, knowing the probable duration of a given engagement can be of great help in determining tactical execution in battle, proper. (Clausewitz 1950, 187) In general, a long war is less desirable than a short war because a long war   represents the obstruction of a single victorious party in any given state of opposition, puts strain on the military forces, and dictates that many engagements, rather than few, will be resultant in the ensuing campaign. Since one hopes to achieve ones objectives in warfare as quickly as possible so as to prevent the possibility of some kind of unforeseen contingency or drastic change in conditions. Despite this generalization, Clausewitz is careful to point out that there is no question at all here of scientific formulas and problems. The relations of the material things are all very simple. The comprehension of the moral forces which come into play is more difficult. Still, even in respect to these, it is only in the highest branches of strategy that intellectual complications and a great diversity of quantities and relations are to be looked for suggesting that in prolonged struggles   as in those of short duration, the leadership roles and moral authority of the combatants in question plays a decisive role in the outcome of such engagements. (Clausewitz 1950, 118) This alter observation offers the modern reader an important insight into the fluidity of Clausewitzs paradigms which seem to partake of the objvctive only insomuch as they become insulated from the damaging influences of time and historical advancement in military theory. Clausewitzs observation that due to the aforementioned moral considerations, strategy borders on politics and statesmanship, or rather it becomes both itself, and, as we have observed before, these have more influence on how much or how little is to be done than on how it is to be executed and this observation, apart from Clausewitzs exhaustive and precise explication of the fundamentals of warfare at a tactical and strategic level, may stand as the most important of all for the modern student. Clausewitzs conclusion regarding the moral influences of war may seem, far and away beyond his notions of objective and subjective or his definitions of the means and ends of warfare, as the most antiquated notion of all.   However, his admonition that the execution of war lies somewhat beyond its moral or political causes is clear when he states that in the single acts of war both great and small, the mental and moral quantities are already reduced to a very small number. (Clausewitz 1950, 118) In conclusion, Clausewitzs On war offers the modern reader an uncannily prescient vision of modern war and its paradigms. The interested student will leave Clausewitzs writings with a much deeper understanding of the objective and subjective criteria which define and occasion armed conflict and it seems prudent to suggest that the definitions of warfare and the definitions of tactics and strategy forwarded by Clausewitz have increased rather than decreased in relevancy over the intervening centuries.

Claremont McKenna Supplement Essay Tips

Claremont McKenna Supplement Essay TipsIf you have completed a Claremont McKenna supplement essay for high school or college, then you may have experienced a reaction like this: 'Your Sample Essay looks amazing. What does it mean?' Perhaps that's what you're asking yourself right now.There is no exact question that can tell you how exactly this supplement will turn out, so the best thing to do is to just make an effort to get yourself as much information as possible on this topic. There are certain questions you must ask yourself in order to get the very best results. Below are some of the things that you need to know about a good supplement essay.First and foremost, you want to make sure that your subject has written all of their essays before they ever put their name to it. The reason behind this is because some people tend to give their own ideas a try first, but then in the end decide they're not good enough.Once you've made sure that they haven't done so, then you'll have to com e up with an essay idea that is consistent with their new composition style. For example, if the subject of the essay is history, then it might be wise to have a discussion about contemporary trends in the field. The essay should be able to express their knowledge and ability to adapt to current trends.Another way to go about this is to give them the opportunity to write about subjects that have not been covered in their supplement essay in the past. For example, if they were assigned a history subject, then you could be creative and write about current events in the world today. This would allow them to stretch their wings and experience other disciplines as well.In addition to making sure that the subject of the essay has already had a chance to write an essay, you also want to make sure that they have had enough time to absorb all of the information contained in the article. This means that you want to give them enough time to read through the entire article, read it at least twi ce, and then spend the rest of the day thinking about it. Doing this allows them to absorb all of the information and structure.In conclusion, the best way to get the very best out of Claremont McKenna Supplement Essay is to ensure that the subject of the essay is familiar with the subject of the supplement. This will help them to make better connections between the two, as well as allowing them to keep it fresh and interesting.

Free Essays on Fools Compared

Fools Compared Both The Man of Mode and The Country Wife contain characters that are the butt of everyone’s jokes. Sir Fopling Flutter and Sparkish are men who think they are not only charming, but lady’s men as well. Throughout the play, the men are continually picked upon for their outlandish behavior. The difference is that Sir Fopling is only concerned about his own opinion of himself, whereas Sparkish is intent on gaining his fellowmen’s approval. Sparkish is a man who is talked about in a negative way by others in The Country Wife. Horner, upon seeing Sparkish, makes the comment, â€Å"the greatest fop, dullest ass, and worst company, as you shall see: for here he comes† (I, 1). Sparkish, however, never seems to realize he is considered a joke, choosing to believe that their constant picking is a sign of acceptance. In one instance he is literally thrown out of the room and they all laugh at him, not with him, but Sparkish comes right back in and offers up a dinner invitation (I, 1). Sir Fopling Flutter is called â€Å"the freshest fool in town† (II, 2), by Lady Townley. He enters their conversation intent on dominating the scene. While the others pick on his clothing, â€Å"your breech though, is a handful too high† (III, 2), he responds with a light quip, â€Å" I have wished it lower a thousand times, but a pox on’t† (III, 2). Sir Fopling chooses to believe that when he is around, he is admired by all. He assumes that others relish in his presence, asking Dorimant, â€Å"let thee and I take air together† (III, 3). However, just as with Sparkish, excuses are made as to why no one can accompany him that evening. â€Å"I am engaged to Medley† (III, 3), Dorimant states. As Sir Fopling exits, everyone makes snide comments about his presence, â€Å"A fine, mettled coxcomb† (III, 3) Medley remarks. â€Å"Brisk and insipid† (III,3) replies Dorimant. Neither Sir Fopling, nor Sparkish, are taken very se r... Free Essays on Fools Compared Free Essays on Fools Compared Fools Compared Both The Man of Mode and The Country Wife contain characters that are the butt of everyone’s jokes. Sir Fopling Flutter and Sparkish are men who think they are not only charming, but lady’s men as well. Throughout the play, the men are continually picked upon for their outlandish behavior. The difference is that Sir Fopling is only concerned about his own opinion of himself, whereas Sparkish is intent on gaining his fellowmen’s approval. Sparkish is a man who is talked about in a negative way by others in The Country Wife. Horner, upon seeing Sparkish, makes the comment, â€Å"the greatest fop, dullest ass, and worst company, as you shall see: for here he comes† (I, 1). Sparkish, however, never seems to realize he is considered a joke, choosing to believe that their constant picking is a sign of acceptance. In one instance he is literally thrown out of the room and they all laugh at him, not with him, but Sparkish comes right back in and offers up a dinner invitation (I, 1). Sir Fopling Flutter is called â€Å"the freshest fool in town† (II, 2), by Lady Townley. He enters their conversation intent on dominating the scene. While the others pick on his clothing, â€Å"your breech though, is a handful too high† (III, 2), he responds with a light quip, â€Å" I have wished it lower a thousand times, but a pox on’t† (III, 2). Sir Fopling chooses to believe that when he is around, he is admired by all. He assumes that others relish in his presence, asking Dorimant, â€Å"let thee and I take air together† (III, 3). However, just as with Sparkish, excuses are made as to why no one can accompany him that evening. â€Å"I am engaged to Medley† (III, 3), Dorimant states. As Sir Fopling exits, everyone makes snide comments about his presence, â€Å"A fine, mettled coxcomb† (III, 3) Medley remarks. â€Å"Brisk and insipid† (III,3) replies Dorimant. Neither Sir Fopling, nor Sparkish, are taken very se r...

Definition of Qualitative Analysis in Chemistry

Definition of Qualitative Analysis in Chemistry In chemistry, qualitative analysis is the determination of the chemical composition of  a sample. It encompasses a set of analytical chemistry techniques that provide nonnumerical information about a specimen. Qualitative analysis can tell you whether an atom, ion, functional group, or compound is present or absent in a sample, but it doesnt provide information about its quantity (how much). Quantification of a sample, in contrast, is called quantitative analysis. Techniques and Tests Qualitative analysis involves chemical tests, such as the Kastle-Meyer test for blood or the iodine test for starch. Another common qualitative test, used in inorganic chemical analysis, is the flame test. Qualitative analysis typically measures changes in color, melting point, odor, reactivity, radioactivity, boiling point, bubble production, and precipitation. Methods include distillation, extraction, precipitation, chromatography, and spectroscopy. Branches of Qualitative Analysis The two main branches of qualitative analysis are organic qualitative analysis (such as the iodine test) and inorganic qualitative analysis (such as the flame test). Inorganic analysis looks at the elemental and ionic composition of a sample, usually by examination of ions in aqueous solution. Organic analysis tends to look at types of molecules, functional groups, and chemical bonds.Example: She used qualitative analysis to find that the solution contained Cu2 and Cl-  ions.

Strategies of Hearing Aids Market Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Strategies of Hearing Aids Market - Essay Example An increase in the price of commodity results in the decrease of the quantity demanded the same commodity and vice versa (Keat and Young, 2009, p. 47). Therefore, if the firms reduce the prices of hearing aids, there can be increased demand for it and as  result firms can achieve higher sales and higher profits. Demand and revenue are closely related. When demand is elastic, the total revenue will be increased due to a decrease in the price of the product. When the percentage of quantity demanded is more than the changes in price, the total revenue will be increasing. While analyzing the price factor and demand for the hearing aids, it can be understood that reducing the prices can be a reasonable measure to expand the demand and market for hearing aids. But same time, the price is often regarded to be an attribute that consumers value a product and its quality. The case of hearing aid markets show that high price has become the main factor behind less demand for it and therefore firms can increase potential demand for the product if they can offer hearing aids for reduced prices. The hearing aid companies can have pricing strategies. Companies can increase the total revenue by decreasing the prices of hearing aids if the demand is Elastic or by increasing the prices if the demand is inelastic. The hearing aids demand is inelastic because there are very few substitutes and it is considered to be an essential device for hearing for those who suffer from hearing loss (Amlani, 2007). So, the hearing aids firms can possibly increase the prices in order to increase the revenue, but it may have to reduce the prices and increase the quality of the products in order to gain a better position among the competitors especially if there is perfect competition in the market. Based on market and situational analysis like Porter’s five force analysis, a marketing manager will be able to analyze various factors like buyer and supplier powers, competition rivalry, potential entry and other threats, and based these the managers will be able to implement either cost-leadership approach or differentiation approach (Keat and Young, 2009, p. 376).  

Undertake project work Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Undertake project work - Assignment Example This will exhibit whether the product is a success or a failure within the market. The period for the project will be three months. a period in which the project will research on the market viability, strengths as well as weakness of the product, inclusive of the consumer reception of the new brand within the Indian market. The project follows the right standards of ethics in research. This means that it will consider all the required steps in conducting a research project, such as freedom of choice by participants, respecting the privacy and choice of participants, as well as giving accurate data for use in the analysis phase of the project. The project requires both financial and intellectual assets in order to undertake appropriately. this includes an experienced team of researchers, project managers, marketing professionals, market analysts, as well as adequate financial resources to undertake the entire project work appropriately. This includes money for the research, money for transport, and money to carry out the various analyses necessary to complete the research. Please identify the clients, employees or team responsible for the projects. Here students should outline each person or team’s responsibilities in order to complete the project. The team’s responsibilities should be aligned with the desired outcomes in the project. You may use the table below: The young ones are equally an important market segment of the company. As such, this market segment needs particular attention in order identify its tastes and preferences, trends, as well as other likes that contribute largely to market viability and growth. The teenagers are the most users of soft drinks, especially owing to their fast transformation from children to adulthood. This is the point when many young ones transform in all ways, especially